🔗 Share this article Relatives' Distress Over Shoreline Degradation Endangering Norfolk Burial Sites Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family. An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations. A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward. “Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.” Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said. Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard. “It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.” “I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.” A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated. “It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.” In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.” Seeking Solutions and Clarity An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious. Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching. “The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.” A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.” It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.” “There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.” The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.